The Rick Amato show is saddened by the recent tragedy at Virginia tech, our thoughts and prayers go out to all affected.
It is amazing how quickly the special interest groups and those with a self fulfilling agenda take center stage to turn a horrific event into their personal soapbox, overlooking the real story, that 32 innocent men and women have lost their lives, leaving countless grieving family members and friends, whose lives will be forever changed.
The media is filled with speculation and second guessing as to how the events could have been avoided or better handled. The special interest groups race to parade their causes, exploiting the lives lost; proclaiming gun control would have prevented the shootings or the contrasting view that armed students and security guards could have stopped it, better planning on the part of the school officials could have saved more lives, scapegoat the mental health professionals who had evaluated Cho Seung-Hui for not reporting his psychological problems, blaming the fact that the family had a hard life, that he was bullied, the professors for not reporting his disturbed writings, and blaming the police because he had two previous stalking cases – all just theories of those thinking their way could have prevented the casualty.
So who is right? While the timing is not, all these opinions make viable arguments; there are countless scenarios that could prevent such a disastrous event.
Conversely, think for a moment, of the precedence set by the courts, the government, the politically correct, and the media in trying to figure out which would best apply. I could go on and on to dispute all the special interest claims.
I’d rather advise a simpler solution: Respect yourself, respect your fellow man, it is not always about coming out in front, but using integrity, common-sense, moral standards, and having accountability - the attributes that are too often under-glamorized and overlooked.
Associate Producer, The Rick Amato Show
The decision as to what is "relevant" is an issue for the Court, specifically here, the Military Judge in the trial. Is Mr. Laurences' opinion relevant to the Court? No. Unless you were one of the attorneys on the defense team (myself, Captains Miller & Merriam) you have no idea what was relevant to our defense strategy or to the co-accused and their attorneys. I pray that when I see this film I deem it irrelvant to the trial.
My concern is that it will be and SSG Girouard, a decorated, multiple combat tour soldier, is sitting in the Fort Leavenworth Disciplinary Barracks and a piece of evidence, the documentary, could have been used at his trial.
Again, I was not afforded the opportunity to form my opinion as his attorney because I was not allowed to see the entire film. Mr. Laurence's job is creating Documentaries and my job is defending Soldiers - why could the 2 have not come together?
Bottom line:
1.COL Steele was given immunity by the Government so his 5th Amend. rights are not at issue
2.I saw a snipit of the documentary on the Saturday before the start of trial and had no idea that this documentary existed until the eve of trial. Did you know of this court-martial or this investigation? I did not know of you so the real question is did you know of the Iron Triangle Investigation?
3. A news anchor who saw the piece stated, as I understood it, and I could be wrong, that you (John Laurence) allegedly threaten legal action.
4.I never said that a briefing alone, given 8 months prior was an excuse for the killigs in this case. Again, you and no one else for that matter are privy to the defense strategy. I was charged with defending SSG Girouard from Life Without the Possibiity of Parole. My curiosity is what if anything else do you have closer in time to the event? Had a he made similar speeches as the one given the day before?
5.Finally, and most importantly, SSG GIROUARD WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY OF PREMEDITATED MURDER! He was found guilty of Negligent Homicide, in essence he negligenty entrusted those detainees to those 2 squad members, the 2 sqaud members who actually shot the detainess not SSG Girouard.
All this being said, we both obvioulsy care about soldiers and I hope too see the entire film and I hope that it facilitates more dialogue on the issue".
Anita Gorecki